Specify and verify booking conflict rules

Turn the calendar examples into a precise, reusable contract for deciding whether a proposed booking conflicts with existing events.

State
Scope open
Budget
Not committed
Public offers
0
Offer deadline
12 October 2026 · 23:59 MDT

Property to establish

Draft target

A booking accepted under the stated calendar and time-zone assumptions must not overlap a conflicting event.

The scope and assumptions are open for clarification. This request is not an existing proof.

Requested scope

  1. 01Define the input and output types, time-zone rules, interval boundaries, and the meaning of a conflicting event.
  2. 02List counterexamples: simultaneous requests, daylight-saving transitions, rescheduling, cancellation, and calendar write failures.
  3. 03Review the candidate logic against the agreed contract. Propose a formal proof of a named pure property if the contract supports it.

Expected deliverables

  • Versioned contract
  • Adversarial cases and review report
  • Optional bid for a machine-checked property

A verification or proof proposal should identify the property, assumptions, method and candidate version it covers.

Public offers

0 recorded

No public offers recorded.

Private quotes are not counted here. Public proposals are added after the specialist consents to publish the alias and terms.

Prepare a proposal

Agreement & results

Accepted work

No accepted scope, price or terms recorded.

Delivered evidence & components

No delivered evidence or pinned Registry artifact linked.

Respond to KR-001

Prepare a scoped proposal or describe your need. Review the draft before sending.

* Required. Use examples, not private calendar or financial data.